GetDraft

• 1. overview (724 chars)

  GetDraft is a multi-AI expert collaborative writing platform launched by the Get team and will be officially launched in November 2025. The platform has five built-in AI roles that perform their own duties, simulating the division of labor and collaboration model of a professional editorial department, helping users efficiently complete the entire process from idea to first draft. Different from the "one-click generation" model of traditional AI writing tools, GetDraft emphasizes the core concept of "humans are the editor-in-chief and AI is the executor", and users retain control at every key decision-making point. The product adopts a points consumption system, with the basics being free, and subsequent payments starting at HK$129/month. The overall user rating is 3.5 points (534 reviews), which is at a medium level among similar products.

• 2. Product background (1029 chars)

  GetDraft is another AI writing product launched by the Get team after "Get Notes". In terms of company background, Get is a well-known knowledge payment platform in China, with a huge knowledge base of more than 100,000 e-books, more than 4,000 courses, and more than 4,000 audio books. This knowledge base provides GetDraft with a solid foundation of content. The connotation of the product naming is divided into two parts: "Get" means "get", which emphasizes helping users achieve the final goal; "Draft" means "draft", which clearly indicates that the content generated by AI is a first draft and requires final review by human authors. This design reflects the product’s insistence on the concept of “human-machine collaboration” – not to allow AI to completely replace human writing, but to enhance human content production capabilities. From an industry development perspective, the emergence of GetDraft marks the evolution of AI writing tools from "replacing human execution" to "augmenting human capabilities." At a time when content is becoming increasingly homogeneous, the platform's style replicating function has unique value and can help creators maintain the consistency of their personal styles.

• 3. Product functions and usage experience (2453 chars)

  GetDraft’s core competitiveness lies in its refined AI role division, simulating the collaboration process of a traditional editorial department. The entire system includes five professional "AI writers", each with their own division of labor and cooperation with each other. Style polisher Azhen is responsible for building users’ writing portraits. This role will deeply deconstruct the user's writing style from six dimensions: style overview, creative methodology, core of thinking, expression characteristics, creative habits and unique marks. Users only need to provide a few historical articles, and the system can automatically generate a unique writing portrait and maintain a unified style in subsequent creations. This feature is especially useful for creators who need to maintain content consistency across multiple platforms. Chief writer Aqiang is the leader of the entire writing process and adopts a "progressive collaboration" model. Unlike traditional AI writing tools that directly output results, Aqiang will first discuss the audience, goals and duration of the topic with the user, provide multiple angles and structural options for the user to choose, and finally enter the content generation process. This design ensures that users retain control at key decision points, rather than simply issuing commands to an executive assistant. Research expert Xiaomei is responsible for in-depth research functions. She can access the APP’s massive knowledge base and high-quality information sources across the entire network, and organize the survey results into structured reports. For industry research articles that need to cite reliable data and recommendations, this feature can significantly improve the efficiency and quality of creation. Sketching expert Xiaoshuai focuses on efficient execution and is suitable for writing scenarios with clear needs and ready-made materials. If you already have complete ideas and materials, Xiaoshuai can complete the expansion and polishing in a short time. The poisonous tongue editor-in-chief mourning barrel is the last quality level. His review style is outspoken and he will put forward revision suggestions from multiple dimensions such as logical loopholes, confusing structure, and unclear sentences. According to the official introduction, Mangbong has a total of 54 modification opinions available for call. This function is equivalent to equipping each user with a senior editor. In terms of writing mode, the product provides two options: inspiration mode and sketching mode. The heuristic mode is the method recommended by the system, simulating the entire process of a professional writing team, advancing step by step and continuously recording writing preferences; the sketch mode is suitable for scenarios with clear needs and ready-made materials, and can quickly generate article drafts.

• 4. Pricing and business model (1124 chars)

  GetDraft uses a points consumption system and is not a completely free product. This business model is more common among AI writing tools, attracting user experience through free credits, and then converting it into ongoing income through payment. New users can get about 800 points for free when they sign up. Considering that a complete inspiration mode creation may consume about 4,000 points, free points may only support one or two in-depth creations. Heavy users will need to subscribe to a paid plan. Paid packages are divided into three levels. The basic free version includes 800 points, 3 writing portraits and 1 parallel task, and is suitable for mild early adopters. The PLUS version costs HK$129 per month (annual payment is HK$1,550) and provides 2,000 points per month (about 80,000 words can be generated), 10 writing portraits and unlimited parallel tasks. This is the most recommended package for individual users. The PRO version costs HK$695 per month (annual payment is HK$8,341), provides 14,000 points and 50 writing portraits per month, and is suitable for corporate teams or high-intensity users. From a cost perspective, some users have reported that points are consumed quickly, especially when the enabled mode consumes more than 4,000 points. If used frequently, the monthly cost may be around 200-300 yuan.

• 5. User reviews (1172 chars)

  Judging from public data, GetDraft's overall score is 3.5 points (based on 534 reviews), which is at a medium level among similar AI writing tools. In contrast, iFlytek's emoji score was 4.8 points, and its draft AI copywriting score was 4.6 points. There is still room for improvement in GetDraft's user satisfaction. Well-known business consultant Liu Run mentioned the experience of using GetDraft (internal beta version) in his annual speech: At that moment, I suddenly felt a little jealous. Maybe this is the real collaboration that human beings have always yearned for. No arguing, no complaining, no waiting. There is only division of labor, collaboration and iteration. He used GetDraft to rewrite the article in the style of his own public account, and it took about 20 minutes for multiple AI characters to collaborate. The main positive points of user feedback include: high content quality and strong style restoration; good interactive experience and visualization of the entire writing process; the collaboration model of the five AI characters is innovative, and the review function of the poisonous editor is professional and strict. Negative views mainly focus on: Points are consumed quickly and the payment cost is relatively high; some users have found that AI content detection may show a higher AI rate, which may be related to the highly anthropomorphic content style.

• 6. Industry evaluation (953 chars)

  From an industry perspective, GetDraft's positioning has differentiated advantages. Most traditional AI writing tools adopt the "task execution" mode, where the user inputs instructions and the AI ​​outputs the results. The entire process is a "black box". GetDraft emphasizes "human-machine collaboration". Users play the role of editor-in-chief and participate in discussions and choices at every key decision-making point. This is a "white box" operating mode. In terms of competitive product comparison, GetDraft has advantages in terms of content generation effect, degree of personalization, interactive experience, etc. compared with products such as Tencent IMA, but it requires payment in terms of usage costs, while products such as IMA are currently in the free testing phase. The core value of the platform is that "it not only allows people to write faster, but also helps people think more clearly." This concept frees human authors from tedious execution work and allows them to focus more on creative creation and decision-making, which represents an important development direction of AI writing tools.

• 7. Controversies and Risks (786 chars)

  Issues regarding AI content detection are issues that users need to pay attention to. Because the content generated by GetDraft is highly consistent with the user's style in terms of language patterns, some users have found that articles generated using this tool may show higher AI content when tested for AI. But from another perspective, this just reflects the success of the product - deep learning of the user's writing style. The cost of paying is something to consider. For high-frequency users, the monthly subscription fee plus points consumption may reach 200-300 yuan, which is indeed high compared with other free or low-cost AI writing tools. In terms of usage threshold, GetDraft is not suitable for users who expect full AI ghostwriting. Product design requires users to deeply participate in the collaboration process, clarify writing goals, clearly express opinions, and have a high level of judgment on text quality.

• 8. Applicable groups and usage suggestions (707 chars)

  GetDraft is suitable for the following groups of people: professional content creators who make a living from writing, especially public account authors and corporate content teams who need to maintain content consistency across multiple platforms; creators who have high requirements for article quality and personal style and want to maintain a unique "voice" in the AI ​​era; industry research report writers who require in-depth research and multiple rounds of iterations. For users who occasionally write essays, users who expect AI to completely ghostwrite, users with sensitive budgets or simple needs, it is recommended to choose other lighter tools. In terms of alternatives, products such as iFlytek Painting, Draft AI Copywriting, and Loomi also provide similar functions, and you can choose according to your own needs.

• 9. Summarize (518 chars)

  GetDraft represents a new way of thinking about AI writing tools - not to replace human writing, but to enhance human content production capabilities. The five AI characters’ collaboration mode, style replication function, knowledge base access and other features make them uniquely valuable in differentiated competition. However, the 3.5 user rating and the fast point consumption also indicate that the product still has room for improvement. It is recommended that users with in-depth writing needs can try it, but it is recommended to use the free quota to fully experience it before deciding whether to pay.

No in-depth report yet

• 

  Diana_Roberts_2023

  —

  刚体验了 GetDraft，整体感觉还行。五位 AI 角色的协作模式确实新颖，风格复刻功能也很实用。不过积分消耗太快了，一次启发模式就花了 4000 积分，心疼我的免费积分。

---

• 

  流光682

  —

  刘润同款确实香！用 GetDraft 仿写公众号风格，20 分钟搞定，毒舌主编的修改意见很专业。

---

• 

  beautifulpanda836

  —

  说实话，3.5 分的评分有点低了，可能是免费版体验有限？

---

• 

  PaulCook

  —

  比想象中好用！阿珍的风格复刻功能很强，我的三篇文章丢进去就能生成专属画像。

---

• 

  Alexander_AdamsK

  —

  付费版plus一个月129港币，约人民币120，性价比一般般。

---

• 

  Evelyn_HicksJr

  —

  不适合小白，需要明确写作目标才能用好。

---

• 

  杜桂

  —

  得到APP知识库确实强大，调研功能很好用！

---

• 

  Victoria_Ruiz_2024

  —

  五 AI 协作模式很创新，不是那种一键生成的工具。

---

• 

  hl3xit

  —

  期待已久的产品，终于上线了！

---

• 

  Sean_Green_Plus

  —

  人机协作的理念很喜欢，建议每个创作者都试试。

---

• 

  EvelynNie_lsen

  —

  用了两周，积分快用完了，该付费了。

---

• 

  ROedw

  —

  和新脑子 Gemini 对比了一下，各有优势吧。

---

• 

  MrAnastasijaVrhovac_pro

  —

  风格复刻功能 yyds！

---

• 

  NicholasMitchell_717

  —

  毒舌主编的 54 条修改意见真的好用，相当于白嫖了一个资深编辑。

---

• 

  JeanThompson_Pro225

  —

  写作模式选启发模式就对了，比速写模式效果好太多。

---

• 

  JAdams_2022705

  —

  交互体验很好，流程可视化。

---

• 

  BMartinez_2021

  —

  测评的文章发出去，用户反馈比之前的更有个人风格。

---

• 

  Emily.AdamsK

  —

  团队版适合企业使用，可以共享写作画像。

---

• 

  云朵565_1

  —

  内容生成效果和个性化程度比腾讯IMA好。

---

• 

  JStephensZ

  —

  不建议预算敏感的用户选择，确实贵。

No reviews yet